Legal Case Summary

Anita Aranda v. Renown South Meadows Medical Center


Date Argued: Thu Apr 18 2013
Case Number: 11-16894
Docket Number: 7837878
Judges:Tunheim, Graber, Christen
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Anita Aranda v. Renown South Meadows Medical Center** **Docket Number: 7837878** **Court:** [Specify the court if known] **Date:** [Specify date of the decision if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Anita Aranda - **Defendant:** Renown South Meadows Medical Center **Background:** Anita Aranda filed a lawsuit against Renown South Meadows Medical Center, alleging [insert the basis of the claim, e.g., malpractice, discrimination, wrongful termination, etc.]. The plaintiff contended that [provide a brief overview of the plaintiff's claims, including specific incidents or actions taken by the medical center that led to the dispute]. **Facts of the Case:** 1. **Incident Date/Occurrence:** [Specify the date or time period when the main incident occurred, if applicable]. 2. **Nature of Claim:** [Describe the nature of the claims, such as negligence, breach of contract, violation of rights, etc.]. 3. **Key Evidence:** [Highlight key pieces of evidence that were presented during the case, such as medical records, witness testimonies, expert opinions, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The main legal issues in this case included: - [List the primary legal issues or questions that the court needed to address, such as duty of care, standard of care, liability, etc.] **Court's Analysis:** The court examined [summarize the court’s reasoning and analysis regarding the claims made by the plaintiff and the defenses raised by the defendant]. The court considered [mention any relevant statutes, regulations, or case law that influenced the decision]. **Decision:** The court ruled [state the court's decision, e.g., in favor of the plaintiff/defendant, and include any awards or orders made by the court, such as damages, injunctions, etc.]. **Conclusion:** This case is significant because [discuss the implications of the case or its importance within the legal context, if applicable]. It showcases [mention any broader legal principles or outcomes that emerged as a result of the case, if relevant]. **Next Steps:** [If there are any noted appeals or further actions, mention them here, or indicate if the case has been concluded]. Please note that more specific details would be necessary to create a comprehensive case summary, such as court rulings, specific legal arguments, and outcomes. The above summary is a generalized format based on typical legal cases and should be tailored with actual case information for accuracy.

Anita Aranda v. Renown South Meadows Medical Center


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available