Legal Case Summary

Channel Centeno v. City of Fresno


Date Argued: Wed Aug 15 2018
Case Number: 17-16830
Docket Number: 7669664
Judges:Siler, Schroeder, Graber
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Channel Centeno v. City of Fresno** **Docket Number:** 7669664 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court of California] **Date:** [Insert date of filing or relevant hearing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Channel Centeno - **Defendant:** City of Fresno **Background:** This case involves a dispute between Channel Centeno and the City of Fresno concerning [briefly explain the nature of the dispute, e.g., excessive force, negligence, civil rights violations, etc.]. The plaintiff alleges that [summarize the plaintiff’s claims, including any relevant facts that support their case, such as specific incidents or actions taken by the City of Fresno]. **Facts:** - On [date], [describe key facts that led to the dispute, including interactions between Centeno and the City or its representatives]. - The plaintiff asserts that [detail the specific grievances, including any policies or laws allegedly violated]. - [Include any relevant evidence or witness statements that support the plaintiff’s case]. **Legal Issues:** - The primary legal issues in this case revolve around [identify the specific legal principles or violations being cited, such as municipal liability, civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, etc.]. - The plaintiff seeks [explain what the plaintiff is seeking through this lawsuit, e.g., damages, injunctive relief, etc.]. **Procedural History:** - The case was filed on [filing date], and significant motions include [summarize any notable motions or rulings made in the case, such as motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment]. - [Mention any hearings or trial dates if applicable]. **Outcome:** - [If available, summarize the outcome of any hearings, motions, or the case itself, including verdicts or settlements]. - [Indicate the next steps if the case is ongoing or in the appeal process]. **Conclusion:** Channel Centeno v. City of Fresno highlights [briefly summarize the broader implications or significance of the case, particularly regarding public policy or municipal law]. The resolution of this case will impact [mention any potential implications for stakeholders, the community, or future legal standards]. --- **Note:** For a complete case summary, further details regarding the court’s opinion, evidence presented, and specific legal reasoning would be necessary, as well as any updates post-filing regarding the case's status.

Channel Centeno v. City of Fresno


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available