Legal Case Summary

Connell v. Multnomah County


Date Argued: Mon Jul 12 2004
Case Number: 03-35206
Docket Number: 7859583
Judges:Goodwin, W. Fletcher, Tallman
Duration: 47 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Connell v. Multnomah County** **Docket Number:** 7859583 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision/Proceedings] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Connell - **Defendant:** Multnomah County **Background:** Connell filed a lawsuit against Multnomah County, alleging [insert the main allegations or claims made by Connell regarding the actions or policies of Multnomah County]. The case centers around [provide a brief overview of the relevant facts of the case, including the context in which the issue arose and any key incidents that led to the legal action]. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues in this case include: 1. [List a primary legal question or issue raised by Connell] 2. [List any additional relevant legal questions or issues] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Connell contends that [summarize the arguments made by Connell, including any evidence or legal precedents cited]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Multnomah County argues that [summarize the defense's position, including counterarguments and justifications for their actions or policies]. **Court's Findings:** The court examined the evidence presented by both parties and addressed the legal issues at hand. The findings included: - [Summarize the key findings of the court regarding the claims made by Connell]. - [Include any relevant observations the court made about the defendant’s actions, policies, or the applicable law]. **Conclusion:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [insert the party that the court ruled in favor of] based on the findings and the application of the law to the facts of the case. The decision included [summarize any remedies provided, such as damages awarded, injunctive relief, or other orders made by the court]. **Significance:** This case is significant because it [discuss the broader implications of the ruling, such as its impact on similar cases, legal precedents set, or policy changes within Multnomah County or other entities]. **Notes:** - [Optionally include any additional notes or remarks that are relevant to the case or future implications]. **Disclaimer:** This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For detailed legal guidance, consult a qualified attorney.

Connell v. Multnomah County


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available