Case Summary
### Case Summary: Creter v. Commonwealth of Virginia
**Docket Number:** 2604730
**Court:** Virginia Court of Appeals
**Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date, if known]
**Facts of the Case:**
Creter v. Commonwealth of Virginia involves the appellant, Creter, who appealed a decision made by the lower court regarding charges filed against him. The original case involved allegations related to [insert specific allegations or charges, if known, e.g., theft, assault, etc.].
**Procedural History:**
The case was initiated in a lower court, where Creter faced trial. Following the trial, the court delivered a verdict against him. In response, Creter filed an appeal, asserting various grounds for overturning the lower court's decision. The appeal was brought to the Virginia Court of Appeals for review.
**Issues on Appeal:**
1. [Insert Issue 1, e.g., whether the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the conviction]
2. [Insert Issue 2, e.g., whether there were procedural errors that affected the outcome of the trial]
3. [Insert any additional issues, if known]
**Arguments:**
- **Appellant’s Arguments:** Creter argued that the lower court made errors in its rulings, including [insert specific arguments, e.g., improper admission of evidence, failure to instruct the jury correctly, etc.]. He also claimed that the verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence.
- **Respondent’s Arguments:** The Commonwealth defended the lower court's decision, asserting that the trial was conducted fairly and that the evidence presented was adequate to support the conviction. They maintained that procedural rules were followed correctly throughout the trial.
**Decision:**
The Virginia Court of Appeals issued its ruling on the appeal. [Insert the court’s decision, e.g., whether the appellate court affirmed, reversed, or remanded the decision of the lower court. Include any relevant opinions or dissenting opinions if applicable.]
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of the case had implications for [insert any possible implications for criminal law, procedural standards, or other relevant areas]. The ruling provided clarification on [insert any legal standards or principles clarified by the case].
**Note:** This summary is based on general procedural expectations in appellate cases and typical elements found in case summaries. The specific details of this case, including the underlying facts, issues, and the court's ruling, would need to be filled in based on the actual case documentation or legal databases.