Legal Case Summary

Darious Mays v. Ken Clark


Date Argued: Wed Nov 19 2014
Case Number: W2013-01989-COA-R3-CV
Docket Number: 2607048
Judges:Reinhardt, Thomas, Christen
Duration: 27 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Darious Mays v. Ken Clark** **Docket Number:** 2607048 **Court:** [Specify the court if known] **Date:** [Specify the date of the decision or filing if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Appellant:** Darious Mays - **Appellee:** Ken Clark **Background:** This case centers around a dispute involving Darious Mays and Ken Clark. The specifics of the case, such as the underlying facts, the nature of the dispute (for instance, whether it concerns a personal injury, contractual issue, or another type of legal matter), were not detailed in the prompt. As such, the summary will focus on procedural aspects and the outcome. **Facts:** Darious Mays, the appellant, filed an appeal against Ken Clark, the appellee. The case emerged from [insert brief description of underlying circumstances or legal claims leading to the appeal, if known]. **Procedural History:** Darious Mays filed an appeal after [describe the decision made by the lower court or agency that Mays is contesting]. The case was brought before [name of the appellate court, if known] where both parties presented their arguments. **Issues:** The primary legal issues raised in this appeal include: 1. [Issue 1 – e.g., whether the lower court erred in its application of the law] 2. [Issue 2 – e.g., whether the evidence was sufficient to support the lower court’s findings] **Ruling:** The appellate court [affirmed, reversed, or remanded] the decision of the lower court. The court found that [insert the reasoning behind the court’s decision, such as any points of law clarified or factual findings noted]. **Conclusion:** The court's decision in the case of Darious Mays v. Ken Clark confirms [insert the legal principle that the ruling establishes or reinforces]. This case serves as a precedent for [mention any implications of the ruling for similar future cases]. **Notes:** Further details regarding the case, including specific legal arguments or evidence presented, would provide a clearer picture of its significance. Accessing the full case file or court opinions would be necessary for a comprehensive understanding. --- Please replace placeholders with specifics as required, and let me know if further details on the case are available for a more thorough summary.

Darious Mays v. Ken Clark


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available