Legal Case Summary

David Barghoorn v. Ken Clark


Date Argued: Thu Sep 15 2016
Case Number: 15-15197
Docket Number: 4422402
Judges:Gould, Berzon, Tunheim
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: David Barghoorn v. Ken Clark, Docket Number 4422402** **Court:** [Name of the Court] **Date:** [Date of the Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** David Barghoorn - **Defendant:** Ken Clark **Background:** In the case of David Barghoorn v. Ken Clark, plaintiff David Barghoorn brought a civil action against defendant Ken Clark regarding [brief description of the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, property dispute, etc.]. The events leading to the case stemmed from [summarize the relevant facts that led to the dispute, including any specific incidents, transactions, or interactions between the parties]. **Claims:** David Barghoorn alleged that Ken Clark [state the specific legal claims made, e.g., breached a contract, committed a tort, etc.]. The plaintiff asserted that as a result of the defendant's actions, he suffered [describe the damages or losses claimed by the plaintiff]. **Defendant's Response:** Ken Clark responded to the allegations by [outline the defense's position or counterclaims, if any, presented by the defendant]. The defendant contended that [summarize any key arguments made by Ken Clark in his defense]. **Court Proceedings:** The case was heard in [court details, including dates of hearings or trial]. Both parties presented their evidence and witness testimonies. [Mention any notable procedural motions, rulings, or evidence that played a critical role in the case.] **Outcome:** The court rendered its decision on [date]. The ruling included [summarize the court's findings, whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or defendant, and provide details on any damages awarded or remedies ordered]. The court concluded that [highlight key points from the court’s reasoning or rationale behind the decision]. **Significance:** The case of David Barghoorn v. Ken Clark is significant because [explain the broader implications of the case, such as its impact on legal precedent, any changes it may cause in law or policy, or its relevance to similar cases]. **Conclusion:** The court’s decision in this case illustrates [summarize any legal principles established or reinforced as a result of the case]. The decision is a notable example of [mention any relevant legal aspects or societal implications]. **Next Steps:** Following the court's ruling, [if applicable, mention any subsequent actions taken by either party, such as appeals or compliance with the court's order]. [Note: Replace placeholders (e.g., court names, specific dates, and details specific to the case) with actual information as necessary. This summary is a general template and may need to be tailored to the specifics of the case.]

David Barghoorn v. Ken Clark


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available