Legal Case Summary

Englum v. The City of Charleston


Date Argued: Wed Apr 19 2017
Case Number: 4-16-0747-4-16-0748-cons
Docket Number: 4846008
Judges:Not available
Duration: 43 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Englum v. The City of Charleston (Docket Number: 4846008)** **Court:** [Insert Relevant Court] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Case Overview:** In the case of Englum v. The City of Charleston, the plaintiff, Englum, brought forth a legal action against the City of Charleston concerning [insert brief summary of the nature of the dispute, e.g., property rights, personal injury, municipal liability, etc.]. The docket number for this case is 4846008. **Facts:** - Englum alleges that [insert key facts that led to the lawsuit, e.g., a specific incident that occurred, any relevant actions taken by the city, etc.]. - [Describe any specific events that occurred leading to the case, the response of the city, and any relevant statutes or regulations involved]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case include: 1. [State the first legal issue, e.g., whether the city was negligent in its duty of care]. 2. [State the second legal issue, if applicable]. 3. [Include any additional legal issues]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Englum contends that [summarize the plaintiff's claims, highlighting key arguments and legal theories]. - **Defendant's Argument:** The City of Charleston argues that [summarize the city’s defense, including any relevant legal principles or defenses they raised]. **Court's Analysis:** The court examined the evidence presented by both parties, assessing [insert key findings from the court’s analysis, referencing any applicable laws or precedents that influenced the decision]. **Ruling:** In its decision, the court [state the court's ruling, whether it was in favor of the plaintiff or defendant, and any specific orders or judgments that were issued, including damages awarded if applicable]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Englum v. The City of Charleston underscores [insert implications of the ruling, such as its impact on municipal liability or local governance, and any broader legal significance]. The case also highlights the importance of [mention any lessons or conclusions that can be drawn from the case]. **Notes:** [Include any additional remarks, next steps, or potential for appeal if applicable.] --- This summary is a generalized template based on a hypothetical case analysis. The specifics should be filled in according to the actual details of Englum v. The City of Charleston.

Englum v. The City of Charleston


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available