Legal Case Summary

Felipe Delgado v. Ortho-McNeil, Inc.


Date Argued: Wed Nov 03 2010
Case Number: 09-55225
Docket Number: 7846793
Judges:Schroeder, Tallman, Smith M.
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Felipe Delgado v. Ortho-McNeil, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7846793 **Court:** [Specify court if known] **Date:** [Insert date if known] **Judges:** [Insert judges if known] **Background:** Felipe Delgado filed a lawsuit against Ortho-McNeil, Inc., alleging that the company's product, specifically a pharmaceutical drug, caused him significant harm. The plaintiff claimed that the drug was marketed inadequately, failing to provide sufficient warnings regarding potential side effects. Delgado asserted that as a result of using the product, he experienced severe health complications that could have been avoided had the company provided appropriate disclosures. **Claims:** Delgado's legal action was primarily grounded in product liability, which included claims of negligence, failure to warn, and breach of warranty. The plaintiff argued that Ortho-McNeil had a duty to ensure the safety of their product and to adequately inform consumers of potential risks. **Key Issues:** 1. **Duty to Warn:** Whether Ortho-McNeil provided adequate warnings about the risks associated with its product. 2. **Causation:** Whether the adverse health effects experienced by Delgado were directly caused by the use of Ortho-McNeil’s drug. 3. **Damages:** The extent of damages suffered by Delgado and whether they were justifiable based on the evidence presented. **Proceedings:** The case proceeded through various pre-trial motions, including discovery disputes and motions for summary judgment. Each party presented expert testimony regarding pharmaceutical safety standards, the adequacy of labels, and the pharmacological effects of the drug in question. **Outcome:** [Insert outcome if known, such as verdict, settlement amount, or dismissal] **Significance:** This case highlights the critical importance of proper pharmaceutical labeling and the responsibilities of drug manufacturers to ensure consumer safety through adequate warnings. It serves as a cautionary tale for companies in the pharmaceutical industry to prioritize transparency and the health impact of their products. **Conclusion:** The case of Felipe Delgado v. Ortho-McNeil, Inc. underscores ongoing discussions around product liability law, the ethical obligations of pharmaceutical companies, and the legal remedies available to consumers harmed by inadequate safety precautions. --- **Note:** Since further details on court rulings, specific evidence, and final outcomes were not provided in the initial prompt, please insert the relevant information as needed.

Felipe Delgado v. Ortho-McNeil, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available