Legal Case Summary

Guadalupe Salazar v. McDonald's Corp.


Date Argued: Wed Oct 17 2018
Case Number: 17-15673
Docket Number: 8045026
Judges:Kleinfeld, Thomas, Graber
Duration: 77 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Guadalupe Salazar v. McDonald's Corp.** **Docket Number: 8045026** **Court:** [Specify Court, if known] **Filed:** [Date of Filing] **Judges:** [Names of Judges, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Guadalupe Salazar - **Defendant:** McDonald's Corporation **Background:** This case involves a complaint filed by Guadalupe Salazar against the fast-food giant McDonald's Corporation. The details of the case stem from an incident involving claims of negligence and premises liability. The plaintiff asserts that she sustained injuries while on the premises of a McDonald's location, alleging that the corporation failed to provide a safe environment for customers. **Facts:** - On [specific date], Salazar visited a McDonald's restaurant at [location]. - The plaintiff claims that an unsafe condition (e.g., a slip, trip, fall, or other hazardous situation) existed on the property, which led to her injuries. - It is alleged that McDonald's did not take adequate steps to remedy the situation despite having prior knowledge or the opportunity to discover the dangerous condition. **Legal Claims:** Salazar is seeking damages for the injuries incurred, arguing that McDonald's negligence in maintaining safe premises directly caused her harm. The legal claims may include: - Negligence - Premises Liability - Claims for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. **Defendant's Response:** McDonald's Corporation is expected to contest the allegations, possibly arguing that they either did not breach any duty of care or that the plaintiff's own actions contributed to her injuries. They may also present evidence demonstrating compliance with safety standards and maintenance protocols. **Current Status:** As of the last update, the case is pending resolution either through settlements, pre-trial motions, or trial. Discovery processes may be underway, with both parties gathering evidence to support their claims. **Significance:** This case raises important questions about corporate responsibility in maintaining safe public spaces and the extent of liability that businesses hold in injury claims resulting from alleged negligence. --- **Note:** The specifics, such as dates and particular arguments, would require access to court records or legal databases, which may detail the circumstances of the case more comprehensively.

Guadalupe Salazar v. McDonald's Corp.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available