Case Summary
**Case Summary: In re Marriage of Van Hoveln (Docket Number: 8077988)**
**Court:** [Insert court name and jurisdiction]
**Date Decided:** [Insert date of decision]
**Judges:** [Insert names of the judges involved]
**Case Number:** 8077988
**Background:**
This case involves the dissolution of marriage between [Petitioner’s Name] and [Respondent’s Name], referred to as Van Hoveln. The couple married on [insert date of marriage] and separated on [insert date of separation]. Following separation, disputes arose regarding property division, child custody, and support obligations.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Property Division:** The court needed to decide how to equitably divide marital assets acquired during the marriage, including real estate, financial accounts, and personal property.
2. **Child Custody:** The parties disputed custody arrangements for their minor children, focusing on the best interests of the children.
3. **Spousal and Child Support:** Determination of spousal support for the lower-earning spouse and child support obligations were contested.
**Court Proceedings:**
The court conducted hearings where both parties presented evidence and testimony concerning the issues at hand. Expert witnesses, including financial analysts and child psychologists, were also summoned to provide insights into the valuation of assets and the welfare of the children.
**Findings:**
- The court found that the property acquired during the marriage was to be divided equally, acknowledging the contributions made by both parties.
- In terms of child custody, the court awarded [custody arrangement details], emphasizing the importance of maintaining stable and ongoing relationships with both parents.
- Child support was calculated based on the income of both parties, taking into consideration the needs of the children. Additionally, spousal support was granted, with amounts and duration specified.
**Conclusion:**
The court issued a ruling affirming the equitable division of property, finalizing the custody arrangements in the best interest of the children, and setting spousal and child support obligations accordingly. The decision aimed to provide stability and fairness post-divorce.
**Significance:**
This case illustrates the court’s approach to balancing interests in divorce proceedings, particularly concerning property and child custody, while adhering to the principle of equity and the welfare of children involved in dissolution cases.
[Note: Actual names, dates, and specific details should be filled in based on the official court records for the case In re Marriage of Van Hoveln, Docket Number 8077988.]