Case Summary
**Case Summary: Janelle Perez v. City of Roseville**
**Docket Number:** 4845975
**Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., Superior Court of California]
**Filing Date:** [Specify filing date if known]
### Parties:
- **Plaintiff:** Janelle Perez
- **Defendant:** City of Roseville
### Background:
Janelle Perez filed a lawsuit against the City of Roseville alleging [specific allegations, e.g., negligence, violation of civil rights, etc.]. The case arises from events that took place on [specify date or time period], during which [briefly describe the context of the incident, e.g., an encounter with law enforcement, an incident on public property, etc.].
### Claims:
The plaintiff, Janelle Perez, asserted the following claims against the City of Roseville:
1. [Claim 1 - e.g., Negligence: Describe the basis of negligence, including any specific duties breached by the City.]
2. [Claim 2 - e.g., Civil Rights Violation: Outline any constitutional rights allegedly violated by the actions of the city or its employees.]
3. [Other claims if applicable.]
### Facts:
- On [specific date], Janelle Perez experienced [describe the event or series of events that led to the lawsuit].
- [Detail any interactions with city employees or law enforcement and the resulting consequences.]
- Janelle asserts that as a result of this incident, she suffered [mention any damages, injuries, or losses claimed, e.g., physical injuries, emotional distress, financial losses, etc.].
### Legal Issues:
The court will need to determine:
- Whether the City of Roseville breached any duty of care owed to Janelle Perez.
- Whether the actions of the City or its agents constituted a violation of Janelle’s rights under applicable law.
### Procedural Posture:
- The case was filed in [date and specific court], and [mention any significant procedural steps taken, such as motions filed, responses entered, etc.].
- [Include any notable developments in the case, such as rulings on motions, settlement talks, or scheduled trial dates.]
### Conclusion:
The outcome of Janelle Perez v. City of Roseville will hinge on the court's interpretation of the facts presented, the application of relevant law, and the determination of liability on the part of the City. Both parties will have the opportunity to present their evidence and arguments in support of their respective positions, and the court will ultimately render a decision based on the merits of the case.
### Next Steps:
- [List any upcoming hearings, deadlines for filings, or expected actions by the court.]
**Note:** This summary is a general overview of the case based on available information. For specific legal advice or detailed insights, consult the case documents or a legal professional.