Legal Case Summary

Leroy Haeger v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co


Date Argued: Tue Mar 10 2015
Case Number: M2014-01178-CCA-R3-CD
Docket Number: 2640437
Judges:Wallace, Smith, Watford
Duration: 83 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Leroy Haeger v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.** **Docket Number:** 2640437 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Date:** [Insert Date Here] **Background:** Leroy Haeger, the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, the defendant, arising from an incident involving injuries sustained by Haeger due to a tire failure. Haeger alleges that the tire, manufactured by Goodyear, was defectively designed and that the company had failed to provide adequate warnings regarding its use. **Claims:** Haeger’s claims against Goodyear include product liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. He asserts that the tire's defect led to a sudden failure that caused a serious accident, resulting in financial losses, personal injuries, and pain and suffering. Haeger is seeking compensatory damages for his medical expenses, lost wages, and other related damages. **Defense:** The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company denies the allegations, arguing that the tire in question was properly manufactured and had been subjected to rigorous quality control standards. Goodyear contends that any defects, if present, were a result of improper use and maintenance by Haeger. Additionally, the company asserts that it provided adequate warnings and instructions for the safe use of its products. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal issues, including: 1. The standards for proving product liability and negligence in the context of automotive products. 2. The burden of proof regarding the existence of a defect and causation. 3. The adequacy of warnings and instructions provided to consumers. **Outcome:** [Insert outcome if available, or indicate that it is pending.] **Significance:** This case is significant as it addresses critical issues in product liability law, particularly pertaining to automotive safety and manufacturer responsibilities. The outcome could have implications for future cases involving tire defects and consumer safety standards. **Note:** Further details may be added as the case progresses through the judicial system. Always refer to official court documents for the most accurate and current information.

Leroy Haeger v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available