Case Summary
**Case Summary: Local 17 Iron Workers Pension v. Harris Davis Rebar**
**Docket Number:** 2663862
**Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey]
**Date:** [Insert date of the decision or filing]
**Background:**
The case involves a dispute between the Local 17 Iron Workers Pension Fund and Harris Davis Rebar, a company engaged in the construction industry. The Pension Fund, representing the interests of retired iron workers, brought a legal action against Harris Davis Rebar regarding alleged violations related to pension contributions.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case revolve around compliance with pension fund obligations, specifically regarding the timely and accurate payment of contributions by Harris Davis Rebar to the Local 17 Pension Fund. The Pension Fund contended that Harris Davis Rebar failed to make requisite contributions as stipulated in their collective bargaining agreement.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff (Local 17 Iron Workers Pension Fund):** The plaintiff argued that the defendant had a contractual obligation to contribute to the pension fund and that failure to do so jeopardized the financial security of the fund and its beneficiaries. They sought remedies including the payment of overdue contributions, interest on unpaid amounts, and potential penalties for non-compliance.
- **Defendant (Harris Davis Rebar):** The defendant may have countered by questioning the calculations of contributions, arguing discrepancies, or asserting that they were in compliance with the agreement. They could also raise defenses related to procedural issues or contest the jurisdiction of the court.
**Court's Findings:**
The court reviewed the evidence presented, including the collective bargaining agreement, financial records, and testimonies. Key findings would focus on whether Harris Davis Rebar indeed failed to meet its obligations and the extent of any financial shortfall affecting the pension fund.
**Outcome:**
The outcome of the case would generally hinge on the court's determination of liability. If the court ruled in favor of the Local 17 Iron Workers Pension Fund, it may have ordered Harris Davis Rebar to pay the overdue contributions along with any associated penalties. Alternatively, if the court found in favor of Harris Davis Rebar, it may have dismissed the claims made by the Pension Fund.
**Significance:**
This case underscores the importance of compliance with pension fund obligations in labor agreements and the impact of such failures on the welfare of employees and retirees. The ruling could have broader implications for similar cases involving pension fund disputes in the construction industry.
[Note: This summary is a hypothetical reconstruction based on typical details associated with such cases. Actual case details, findings, and outcomes may vary and should be verified with legal records or databases for accuracy.]