Legal Case Summary

Lolong v. Gonzales


Date Argued: Thu Oct 05 2006
Case Number: 03-72384
Docket Number: 7855871
Judges:Schroeder, Pregerson, Rymer, Kleinfeld, Hawkins, Thomas, Silverman, McKeown, Fisher, Gould, Paez, Tallman, Rawlinson, Bybee, Bea
Duration: 63 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Lolong v. Gonzales, Docket No. 7855871** **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Supreme Court of [State], United States Court of Appeals, etc.] **Date:** [Specify date of the decision] **Judges:** [List the judges involved] **Background:** Lolong v. Gonzales involves a legal dispute stemming from [briefly describe the nature of the case, e.g., immigration issues, personal injury, contract disputes, etc.]. The petitioner, Lolong, challenged the actions/decisions of the respondent, Gonzales, leading to this case being brought before the court. **Facts:** - Lolong [insert relevant facts regarding the petitioner’s situation, e.g., their immigration status, contractual obligations, etc.]. - Gonzales [insert relevant facts regarding the respondent's position, actions taken, and any relevant context]. - [Summarize any relevant events leading up to the filing of the case, including dates and significant actions]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal questions before the court in Lolong v. Gonzales include: 1. [State the first legal issue, e.g., whether the actions taken by Gonzales were lawful under specific statutes or regulations]. 2. [State the second legal issue, e.g., the interpretation of a specific provision or constitutional right]. 3. [Any additional legal issues raised in the case]. **Arguments:** - **Petitioner’s Argument (Lolong):** Lolong argued that [summarize the main points of Lolong’s legal argument, including applicable laws and precedents]. - **Respondent’s Argument (Gonzales):** Gonzales contended that [summarize the key points of Gonzales’ defense and legal reasoning]. **Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [the petitioner/respondent], holding that [summarize the court's decision, mentioning any statutes or precedents invoked in the decision]. The court found that [briefly describe the rationale for the decision and its implications]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights [discuss the broader implications of the case, such as its impact on similar cases, legal precedents established, or policy issues]. The ruling in Lolong v. Gonzales serves as a significant reference for [mention any relevant future considerations in the law or public policy]. **Note:** This summary is intended to provide a concise overview of the Lolong v. Gonzales case. For a complete understanding, one should review the full text of the court’s opinion along with any concurring or dissenting opinions. --- *Please modify specific details as per the actual case information, as the above summary is provided without access to the complete case details.*

Lolong v. Gonzales


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available