Case Summary
**Case Summary: Raymond Parent v. Michael Astrue**
**Docket Number**: 7838653
**Court**: [Assuming a Federal District Court based on the context; please specify if different]
**Date**: [Date of the court decision or relevant filing]
**Parties Involved**:
- **Plaintiff**: Raymond Parent
- **Defendant**: Michael Astrue, in his capacity as Commissioner of Social Security
**Background**:
This case involves Raymond Parent, who filed a complaint against Michael Astrue, the then-Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA). The plaintiff sought review of the SSA’s decision regarding his eligibility for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits.
**Facts**:
- Raymond Parent claimed that he suffered from medical conditions that rendered him unable to work, thereby entitling him to SSDI benefits.
- The SSA initially denied his application for benefits, concluding that Parent did not meet the criteria set forth in the Social Security Act.
- Parent appealed the decision, arguing that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in his assessment of the medical evidence, particularly regarding his disability status and residual functional capacity.
**Issues**:
1. Did the ALJ correctly apply the legal standards for determining disability under the Social Security Act?
2. Was the decision of the SSA supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record?
**Ruling**:
The court reviewed the record to determine whether the SSA's decision was supported by substantial evidence. In its opinion, the court assessed the credibility of medical professionals' evaluations, Parent’s testimony, and the procedural aspects of the SSA's decision-making process.
**Conclusion**:
The court either upheld or reversed the decision of the SSA, depending on the findings regarding the ALJ’s application of the law and the evidence presented. It emphasized the importance of a comprehensive review of all medical documentation and the need for the SSA to provide clear justifications for its decisions regarding disability claims.
**Implications**:
The outcome of this case impacted not only Raymond Parent's claim for SSDI benefits but also set precedents for how similar cases regarding disability determinations might be evaluated in the future.
---
(Note: This case summary is fictional and intended for illustrative purposes based on the provided information. Specific details such as dates, factual background, and legal reasoning would require access to the actual case documents.)