Legal Case Summary

Rickey Calhoun v. King County Prosecuting Attorn


Date Argued: Thu Oct 08 2009
Case Number: 08-35348
Docket Number: 7848948
Judges:Nelson D. W., Silverman, Ikuta, Canby, Leavy
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Rickey Calhoun v. King County Prosecuting Attorney** **Docket Number:** 7848948 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court, Court of Appeals, etc.] **Date of Filing:** [Specify Date] **Judges Involved:** [List Judges, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Appellant/Petitioner:** Rickey Calhoun - **Respondent:** King County Prosecuting Attorney **Background:** Rickey Calhoun filed a case against the King County Prosecuting Attorney, asserting claims related to [briefly specify the nature of the claims, e.g., wrongful conviction, prosecutorial misconduct, denial of rights, etc.]. The case arises from events that transpired on [specify date of incident if known], leading to legal actions by the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office. **Legal Issues:** The primary issues at stake in this case involve: 1. [First legal issue, e.g., the legitimacy of the charges brought against Calhoun] 2. [Second legal issue, e.g., alleged violations of due process] 3. [Any other relevant legal issue] **Arguments:** - **For the Appellant:** Rickey Calhoun argues that [summarize the key arguments made by Calhoun, including any evidence or legal precedents cited]. - **For the Respondent:** The King County Prosecuting Attorney's office contends that [summarize the key arguments made by the Respondent, including supporting legal rationale]. **Court Proceedings:** The court hearings took place on [specify dates of hearings, if known]. During the proceedings, both parties presented evidence and witness testimonies. Key points of contention included [summarize critical aspects of the hearings, such as witness credibility, evidence admissibility, etc.]. **Decision:** [Summarize the court's ruling, indicating whether Calhoun's claims were upheld or dismissed. Include any penalties, changes to legal status, or required actions by the prosecutor's office if applicable.] **Conclusion:** The outcome of Rickey Calhoun v. King County Prosecuting Attorney highlights critical aspects of [mention any significant legal principles, implications for future cases, or broader societal issues addressed by the ruling]. **Next Steps:** Should either party wish to appeal this decision, [specify the timeframe and process for filing an appeal, if applicable]. **Note:** This summary is based on available information regarding case docket number 7848948. For detailed legal analysis and additional context, refer to case documents and legal commentary. --- *Please consult official court documents and legal experts for precise details and legal standing regarding the case.*

Rickey Calhoun v. King County Prosecuting Attorn


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available