Legal Case Summary

Rob Handy v. Lane County


Date Argued: Fri Oct 10 2014
Case Number: D063363
Docket Number: 2592370
Judges:Gould, Christen, Nguyen
Duration: 22 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Rob Handy v. Lane County Docket Number: 2592370** **Court:** [Specify court jurisdiction, e.g., Oregon Circuit Court, Lane County] **Date Filed:** [Insert filing date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Rob Handy - **Defendant:** Lane County **Background:** Rob Handy, the plaintiff, initiated legal action against Lane County, raising concerns regarding [insert specific issues, such as zoning decisions, land use, public regulations, etc.]. The case stems from allegations made by Handy regarding [insert key facts and context of the case, such as authority over public lands, conflict of interest, breaches of duty, etc.]. **Key Issues:** The primary legal issues at stake in this case include: 1. [First issue - e.g., the legality of certain decisions made by Lane County] 2. [Second issue - e.g., adherence to statutory requirements or local ordinances] 3. [Any additional pertinent issues] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Rob Handy contends that Lane County acted [insert plaintiff's claims, e.g., unlawfully, outside its authority, in violation of his rights, causing harm, etc.] and seeks [insert what the plaintiff is asking for, such as damages, injunctions, reversals of decisions, etc.]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Lane County defends against Handy’s allegations by asserting [summarize the defendant's counterarguments, such as legality of actions, justification of decisions made, lack of standing by the plaintiff, etc.]. **Procedural History:** [Outline key procedural steps in the case, such as motions filed, hearings conducted, any appeals, etc. Provide timelines where relevant.] **Outcome:** [If the case has been concluded, provide a summary of the court’s ruling and any implications. If the case is ongoing, outline next steps or scheduled hearings.] **Significance:** The outcome of Rob Handy v. Lane County may have noteworthy implications for [identify broader implications, such as local governance, public policy, or rights of citizens in similar contexts]. **Conclusion:** This case represents a significant legal confrontation between an individual citizen and a county government over [summarize the main conflict]. The resolution of this matter will be crucial in determining both the authority of local governments and the rights of individuals in matters related to [insert relevant issues]. **Note:** For specific legal citations and detailed developments, consult court documents and official records associated with Docket Number 2592370.

Rob Handy v. Lane County


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available