Legal Case Summary

Steven Thomas v. R. Holly


Date Argued: Wed May 15 2013
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2601563
Judges:Paul V. Niemeyer, Barbara Milano Keenan, Clyde H. Hamilton
Duration: 43 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Steven Thomas v. R. Holly** **Docket Number:** 2601563 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Circuit Court, etc.] **Date:** [Specify Date of Judgment/Decision] **Overview:** The case of Steven Thomas v. R. Holly involves a legal dispute in which the plaintiff, Steven Thomas, took action against the defendant, R. Holly. The details of the case revolve around issues of [specify nature of the dispute, e.g., negligence, breach of contract, personal injury, etc.]. **Facts:** 1. Steven Thomas filed a complaint against R. Holly on [insert filing date]. 2. The main allegations pertain to [outline key facts that led to the dispute, such as events leading to the lawsuit, specific actions by R. Holly that are disputed, etc.]. 3. [Include any relevant background information about the parties involved]. 4. The plaintiff asserts that [provide details about the plaintiff's claims and the relief sought, if applicable]. **Legal Issues:** - The primary legal issues in this case include [list the main legal questions or issues that the court needed to address]. - [Mention any specific laws or legal precedents that are relevant to the case]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Position:** Steven Thomas's legal representation argues that [summarize the key points of the plaintiff's argument, including any evidence presented]. - **Defendant's Position:** R. Holly counters by arguing that [summarize the defendant’s response, including any defenses raised]. **Court Decision:** - The court rendered its decision on [insert date of the ruling]. - The ruling [state the outcome, whether it was in favor of the plaintiff or defendant, and include any judgments or orders made by the court]. - The court found that [summarize the court's reasoning and key points from the judgment]. **Conclusion:** The case of Steven Thomas v. R. Holly highlighted significant issues regarding [discuss the implications of the ruling, its significance in the broader legal context, or its impact on the involved parties]. This ruling sets a precedent for [mention anything noteworthy about how this case may influence future cases or legal interpretations]. **Recommendation:** [If applicable, suggest any further legal action or considerations for either party moving forward, including the potential for an appeal]. **Note:** The specifics of this summary (such as court name, dates, and law specifics) would need to be filled in based on the actual details of the case.

Steven Thomas v. R. Holly


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available