Legal Case Summary

Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. R. Wong


Date Argued: Wed Mar 19 2014
Case Number: 09-99016
Docket Number: 7836422
Judges:Thomas, Wardlaw, Berzon
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. R. Wong** **Docket Number:** 7836422 **Court:** [Specify the Court, e.g., District Court, Appellate Court, etc.] **Date:** [Provide the date of the decision or hearing] **Parties:** - **Appellant:** Teofilo Medina, Jr. - **Appellee:** R. Wong **Background:** Teofilo Medina, Jr. filed an appeal against R. Wong concerning a legal dispute that arose from [specify the nature of the dispute, e.g., contract violation, tort claim, etc.]. The case centers around [briefly describe the key facts relevant to the dispute, including dates, actions taken by parties, and the context of the disagreement]. **Issues:** The primary issues before the court included: 1. [Issue 1: Clearly outline the first legal question or issue.] 2. [Issue 2: Clearly outline the second legal question or issue, if applicable.] 3. [Additional issues, if relevant.] **Ruling:** The court [decided/ruled] in favor of [either appellant or appellee], concluding that [summarize the court's decision and the rationale behind it]. The court found that [elaborate on key findings, evidence reviewed, and relevant laws or precedents that influenced the decision]. **Legal Principles:** This case highlights important legal principles regarding [briefly mention the legal principles or statutes that were central in the court's ruling]. The court's interpretation of [specific laws or precedents] set a significant precedent for future cases involving similar circumstances. **Conclusion:** The case of Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. R. Wong illustrates [summarize the implications of the case, the significance of the ruling, and any potential impact on existing or future law]. The court's decision not only resolved the immediate dispute between the parties but also contributed to the broader body of law regarding [specify the area of law]. **Follow-Up:** [Indicate any possibilities for further appeal, remand proceedings, or additional hearings that might follow based on the court’s ruling.] --- *Note: Please ensure to add any additional specifics relating to the facts, issues, and outcomes of the case as necessary, including relevant dates and citations.*

Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. R. Wong


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available